The fate of the Endangered Species Act rests on 2 simple words

The recent redefinition of the words "take" and "harm" under the Endangered Species Act by the Trump administration has significant implications for the solar industry and conservation efforts. By narrowing the definition of these terms, the administration has effectively reduced the scope of protections for endangered species, making it easier for projects such as solar farms and transmission lines to be approved without undergoing rigorous environmental review.

This change is particularly concerning for the solar industry, as large-scale solar projects often intersect with habitats of protected species. For example, the desert tortoise and the Joshua tree are both listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA and are found in areas with high solar potential. As the demand for solar energy continues to grow, the industry will need to navigate these new regulations and ensure that projects are designed and built in a way that minimizes harm to protected species.

As the solar industry moves forward, it's essential to watch how these changes play out in practice and whether they lead to increased conflicts between conservation goals and renewable energy development. Additionally, the outcome of ongoing lawsuits challenging the Trump administration's rule changes and the potential for future policy shifts under a new administration will be critical to follow. The balance between promoting clean energy and protecting biodiversity will remain a pressing issue for the solar industry and policymakers in the years to come.

Originally reported by grist.org. SolarNews adds analysis for climate & energy readers.